S
M
L

Search Result

Title Taipei Exchange Rules Governing the Review of Call (Put) Warrants for Trading on the TPEx CH
Date 2014.02.21 ( Amended )

Article Content

Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4 A securities firm that concurrently operates securities underwriting, proprietary trading, and brokerage or intermediary services may apply for approval as a qualified call (put) warrant issuer. Where the entity is a foreign institution, it shall submit a consent letter or performance guarantee from the board of directors, and file an application with the GTSM in the name of the foreign institution through its branch office within the territory of the ROC or through a branch office established within the territory of the ROC by its directly or indirectly wholly owned subsidiary. The enterprises operated by such subsidiary or by such branch office within the territory of the ROC shall also satisfy the above requirement. A securities firm applying for approval as a qualified call (put) warrant issuer shall satisfy the following requirements: 1.Its equity, based on its CPA audited and attested parent company only or individual financial report for the most recent period, is at least NT$3 billion. If it is a foreign institution, apart from compliance with the forgoing provision with respect to equity on the part of the head office, its branch office established within the territory of the Republic of China, or branch office established within the territory of the Republic of China by its directly or indirectly wholly owned subsidiary, shall have a net worth of at least NT$150 million. 2.Its net worth as shown in the CPA audited and attested parent company only or individual financial report for the most recent period may not be lower than its paid-in capital. 3.It must have a credit rating of a certain grade issued by a credit rating institution approved or recognized by the competent authority. 4.Its regulatory capital adequacy ratio during the half-year period prior to the date of application is 200 percent or higher; or, where the securities firm is a foreign institution, a similar circumstance applies to the head office. 5.It must set out a strategy for offsetting foreseeable risks. Where a securities firm engages a foreign institution to act as a risk management institution, or where a securities firm is a foreign institution, it shall first obtain a consent letter from the competent authority in charge of foreign exchange before it may file an application with the GTSM. Where a foreign securities firm referred to in paragraph 1 has established a branch office within the territory of ROC through its directly or indirectly wholly owned subsidiary, the branch office shall be designated to be responsible for carrying out matters related to the issuance, trading, and exercise of the warrants and disclosure of relevant information. The provisions of Article 5 and Article 7, paragraph 3, hereof shall not apply thereto.
Article 5 Where a securities firm does not conform to the standards set forth in paragraph 2, subparagraph 1, of the preceding article, but has equity of NT$1 billion or more, it shall enter into an agreement with a financial institution which, according to both the laws of its country of incorporation registration and its own articles of incorporation, may act as a guarantor, and, at the time of application for GTSM listing of call (put) warrants, enter into an irrevocable guaranty agreement with the financial institution, which will act as a joint and several guarantor to ensure the securities firm's performance of its contractual obligations for the given issue of call (put) warrants; provided, the guarantor institution shall still conform to the standards set forth in paragraph 2, subparagraphs 1 through 3 of the preceding article. The amount of the guaranty under the guaranty agreement referred to in the preceding paragraph shall be a sum equal to at least 20 percent of: (the issuance or trade volume of the given call (put) warrants) x (the strike price or strike index) x (the multiplier).
Article 6
Article 7 The term "credit rating of a certain grade" in Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 3, and Article 6 hereof, with respect to a securities firm applying to issue call (put) warrants and for their GTSM listing and trading, means a required rating of twBB- or above obtained from Taiwan Ratings Corporation, BB- (twn) or above from Fitch Ratings Limited, Taiwan Branch, or Ba3.tw or above from Moody's Investors Service Taiwan, or Ba3 or above from Moody's Investors Service, BB- or above from Standard and Poor's, or BB- or above from Fitch Inc. With respect to a securities firm applying to conduct GTSM contract-based call (put) warrant business, it means a required rating of twBBB- or above obtained from Taiwan Ratings Corporation, BBB- (twn) or above from Fitch Ratings Limited, Taiwan Branch, or Baa3.tw or above from Moody's Investors Service Taiwan, or Baa3 or above from Moody's Investors Service, or BBB- or above from Standard and Poor's, or BBB- or above from Fitch Inc. Where a securities firm or a risk management institution is a foreign institution or a subsidiary of an ROC-based financial holding company, it may adopt the credit rating of its group holding company, in which case the group holding company shall provide an unconditional and irrevocable guaranty. For one applying to issue call (put) warrants and also for GTSM listing and trading, the credit rating of the holding company shall comply with the provisions of paragraph 1; for one applying to conduct GTSM contract-based call (put) warrant business, it shall comply with the provisions of paragraph 2. The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to a securities firm that is a subsidiary wholly owned directly or indirectly by a foreign institution and registered within the Republic of China.
Article 8 Where any of the following circumstances applies to a securities firm applying to be a qualified call (put) warrant issuer, the GTSM may decline to process approval of its qualification. In the event that the circumstance set forth in subparagraph 4 applies to a securities firm, but the securities firm has shown concrete improvement in the circumstances, and the competent authority has recognized the improvement, the securities firm may be exempted from the restriction thereunder: 1.It has made incomplete submission of required application documents, and has failed to supplement those documents by the deadline prescribed by the GTSM. 2.Particulars of the application do not conform to laws and regulations, or the application contains falsehoods or concealments. 3.There is an instance of major default which has yet to be settled, or less than 4 years have elapsed since settlement of the default. 4.Non-conformance with any of the subparagraphs 2 through 5 under Article 38, paragraph 1 of the Standards Governing the Establishment of Securities Firms, or, in the case of a foreign institution, any similar circumstances applying to the head office. 5.It lacks appropriate mechanisms for risk management. 6.It has been incapable of meeting obligations in connection with any previous issue of call (put) warrants. 7.It has been incapable of carrying out issuance in conformance with relevant GTSM rules governing call (put) warrants within the previous year and unable to make rectification within a time limit. 8.It has not prepared its financial reports in conformance with generally accepted accounting principles or its internal control systems fail to operate effectively. 9.It has violated Article 6 of the Issuance Regulations, or review of its reported matters shows threat of a material effect on its financial status. 10.There are serious equity disputes or violations of regulations sufficient to adversely affect its finances or operations that have not been resolved or rectified. 11.There is factual evidence of serious irregular circumstances in its finances or operations. 12.There is nonconformance with any provision of these Rules relating to an applicant's financial status. Where any of the following circumstances applies to a securities firm that has already obtained approval of its qualification, the securities firm shall suspend issuance or handling of call (put) warrants and shall not resume until it has complied with the relevant provision; the issuance operations of the warrants already approved but not yet issued shall be suspended, and the suspension shall be reported to the competent authority for recordation. However, the validity of call (put) warrants already issued or already traded shall not be affected. The same shall also apply where the securities firm is a foreign institution and any similar circumstance applies to its head office. 1.Failure to concurrently operate the following three businesses: securities underwriting, proprietary trading, and brokerage or intermediary services. 2.The financial report of the most recent period audited and attested, or reviewed, by a CPA is not in compliance with the standards set forth in Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 or 2 of these Rules, except in cases of noncompliance with the standards set forth in Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 where the actions set out in Article 5 have been taken. 3.The regulatory capital adequacy ratio is below 150 percent, or for 3 consecutive months is below 200 percent. 4.The credit rating is lower than the minimum requirement. If any of the events listed in the subparagraphs below occurs after a securities firm has obtained qualification approval, the securities firm shall be restricted from applying to issue or handle call (put) warrants for 1 year. If the securities firm has already obtained approval for issuance or handling but has not yet issued or handled the warrants, it shall be suspended from the issuance or handling, and the suspension shall be reported to the competent authority for recordation. However, the validity of call (put) warrants already issued or handled shall not be affected: 1.The securities firm is ranked in Level 5 for the most recent year, or in Level 4 for the most recent 2 years, in the assessment conducted pursuant to the Operation Directions for Assessment of Securities Firms Risk Management System. 2.The securities firm has violated Article 23, paragraph 1 herein or provisions of the GTSM Operation Directions Governing Liquidity Providers of Call (Put) Warrants, and it has been sanctioned within the most recent year by the GTSM or the TWSE by imposition of penalties in a cumulative amount of NT$300,000 or more or by restriction of application for issuance of call (put) warrants two times. 3.The securities firm has been restricted by the GTSM from applying for issuance of call (put) warrants because of an irregularity in the quotation system of its call (put) warrant liquidity provider in the current year, and it still has failed to take corrective action. Directions for handling irregularities in the quotation system of a call (put) warrant liquidity provider shall be separately prescribed by the GTSM. A securities firm that continuously fails to issue any call (put) warrants for 1 year or more shall be suspended from the issuance or handling of call (put) warrants. The GTSM may report a securities firm in writing to the competent authority for recordation if the aforesaid circumstance occurs or if, pursuant to paragraph 2, the securities firm has been suspended from issuing of or handling issuance matters regarding call (put) warrants for 1 year or more and still fails to take corrective action.
Article 8-1 Upon receipt of approval of qualification as an issuer of call (put) warrants from the competent authority, a securities firm shall, every year within 3 days after receipt of a credit rating from a credit rating company, file a written report with the GTSM with relevant supporting documents annexed thereto. The same shall apply upon any changes in the credit within a period.
Article 9 A securities firm having received approval of qualification as an issuer of call (put) warrants from the competent authority and wishing to apply to the GTSM for GTSM listing of a planned call (put) warrants issue shall apply to the GTSM with an Application for GTSM Listing of Call (Put) Warrants (Attachment 2) filled out in full and with the required documents attached thereto. Following its review and approval of the issuance plan, the GTSM will immediately issue a letter of approval, with a copy to the competent authority, provided that depending on specific conditions such as the applicant's financial or business status, the status of the underlying securities or index, the number of call (put) warrants already listed on the GTSM with identical or similar types of underlying securities, and the distribution of expiration dates, the GTSM may withhold approval, limit the number of warrants to be listed on the GTSM, or impose other conditions. For GTSM listed warrants, in the event that the outstanding issuance units reach 90 percent or more of the actual total number of issuance units, the securities firm may apply to the GTSM for a follow-on issue of call (put) warrants. The application shall be made within 2 business days from the next business day following the date of the event's occurrence but at least 10 business days before the last trading day for the warrants. The term "actual total number of issuance units," as used above, means the number arrived at by adding the total number of issuance units of the initial issue and the number of issuance units of each subsequent follow-on issue together and then deducting the accumulated number of issuance units cancelled and exercised. After receiving a GTSM approval letter, with a copy submitted to the competent authority, the securities firm may entrust an underwriter with underwriting of the issue or it may sell the warrants itself, and provide a prospectus to the subscribers. But this provision shall not apply to a follow-on issuance of call (put) warrants. The directions for information to be published in a public offering prospectus referred to in the preceding paragraph will be promulgated by the GTSM in accordance with Article 13 of the Regulations Governing Applications for Issuance of Call (Put) Warrants by Issuers and shall take force upon review and ratification by the competent authority.
Article 10
Article 10-1
Article 11
Article 12 Where any of the following conditions apply, the GTSM may withhold approval for an application by a securities firm for GTSM listing of a projected issue of call (put) warrants: 1.It has made incomplete submission of required application documents, and it has failed to supplement those documents by the deadline prescribed by the GTSM. 2.The particulars of its application do not conform to laws and regulations, or there is any falsehood or concealment in the application. 3.The securities firm or its affiliated company has, during the month preceding application, released any forecast or information relating to the price of the underlying securities or the underlying index of its projected call (put) warrants issue. 4.When the underlying security of the projected issue of warrants is a domestic stock, and the securities firm or its directors, supervisors, managerial officers, employees, or shareholders holding 10 percent or more of its shares, or any other company 10 percent or more of whose shares are held by any of the above, are at the same time a director, supervisor, or managerial officer of, or shareholder with a stake of 10 percent or more in the issuing company of the underlying security(ies) or any of the issuing companies of the basket of underlying GTSM securities. But this provision shall not apply to a follow-on issuance of call (put) warrants. 5.The issuer's financial report for the most recent period, audited and attested, or reviewed, by a CPA does not comply with the standards set forth in Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 or 2 of these Rules, except in cases of noncompliance with the standards set forth in Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 where the actions set out in Article 5 have been taken. 6.The aggregate amount of the market value and trade prices of the securities firm's currently TWSE listed, GTSM listed, and GTSM contract-based call (put) warrants that have been issued in the ROC and whose period of validity has not yet expired, and call (put) warrants that have been issued in any overseas market and whose period of validity has not yet expired, and the projected issue of call (put) warrants, together with the total amount of the guarantee and the assets provided as security for the offshore call (put) warrants issuing business of its offshore subsidiary, falls under any of the following conditions: A.Its credit rating is a Taiwan Ratings Corporation Class A rating or above, a Moody's Investors Service Class A rating or above, a Standard & Poor's Corp. Class A rating or above, a Fitch Inc. Class A rating or above, a Fitch Ratings Limited, Taiwan Branch Class A (twn) rating or above, or a Moody's Investors Service Taiwan Class A.tw rating or above, and the aggregate amount exceeds 60 percent of the securities firm's eligible net regulatory capital. B.Its credit rating is a Taiwan Ratings Corporation Class BBB- rating or above, a Moody's Investors Service Class Baa1, Baa2, or Baa3 rating or above, a Standard & Poor's Corp. Class BBB- rating or above, a Fitch Inc. Class BBB- rating or above, a Fitch Ratings Limited, Taiwan Branch Class BBB- (twn) rating or above, or a Moody's Investors Service Taiwan Class Baa1.tw, Baa2.tw, or Baa3.tw rating or above, and the aggregate amount exceeds 50 percent of the securities firm's eligible net regulatory capital. C.Its credit rating is a Taiwan Ratings Corporation Class BB+ rating or above, a Moody's Investors Service Class Ba1 rating or above, a Standard & Poor's Corp. Class BB+ rating or above, a Fitch Inc. Class BB+ rating or above, a Fitch Ratings Limited, Taiwan Branch Class BB+ (twn) rating or above, or a Moody's Investors Service Taiwan Class Ba1.tw rating or above, and the aggregate amount exceeds 30 percent of the securities firm's eligible net regulatory capital. D.Its credit rating is a Taiwan Ratings Corporation Class BB rating or above, a Moody's Investors Service Class Ba2 rating or above, a Standard & Poor's Corp. Class BB rating or above, a Fitch Inc. Class BB rating or above, a Fitch Ratings Limited, Taiwan Branch Class BB (twn) rating or above, or a Moody's Investors Service Taiwan Class a2.tw rating or above, and the aggregate amount exceeds 20 percent of the securities firm's eligible net regulatory capital. E.Its credit rating is a Taiwan Ratings Corporation Class BB- rating or above, a Moody's Investors Service Class Ba3 rating or above, a Standard & Poor's Corp. Class BB- rating or above, a Fitch Inc. Class BB- rating or above, a Fitch Ratings Limited, Taiwan Branch Class BB- (twn) rating or above, or a Moody's Investors Service Taiwan Class Ba3.tw rating or above, and the aggregate amount exceeds 10 percent of the securities firm's eligible net regulatory capital. The above-mentioned eligible net regulatory capital shall be calculated based on the method for calculating eligible net regulatory capital set forth in the Regulations Governing Securities Firms. The foregoing eligible net regulatory capital applies to ROC securities firms. In the case of a foreign institution, it is calculated by (the net worth on the most recent financial reports of its branch(es) within the Republic of China or branch(es) established within the Republic of China by its wholly owned subsidiaries) x (net available funds multiplier). 7.The securities firm is a foreign institution, and at the time of application to issue call (put) warrants, the inward remittance of capital required for a hedge on the issue (the amount remitted to the ROC minus the amount not required for a hedge on the issue) is less than the market value of the underlying securities represented by the non-matured TWSE listed and GTSM listed call (put) warrants (including the current issue) and any GTSM contract-based call (put) warrants traded. Or, it has failed to issue a letter of undertaking stating that the premiums collected for the given issue of warrants will not be remitted out of the ROC until after the expiration of the period of validity of the warrants. 8.There are irregular fluctuations in the price of the underlying security(ies) within the 3 months prior to the date of application, and the GTSM has taken corresponding measures under the Regulations Governing Implementation of the GTSM Monitoring System. 9.There is any other factor arising out the nature of the enterprise or exceptional circumstances that may be deemed to have an adverse effect on the applicant's settlement of the option or the price of the underlying securities. 10.There are any of the circumstances set forth in Article 8, paragraph 1 of these Rules. When the circumstance set forth in Article 8, paragraph 1, subparagraph 4 applies to an issuer intending to conduct warrant business, apart from the condition that the period of the sanction imposed on the issuer to suspend its business must be expired, if the issuer has shown concrete improvement in the circumstances, and the competent authority has recognized the improvement, or if the issuer fell under the subparagraph 4 circumstance for reasons other than conducting warrant business, the securities firm may be exempted from restriction under the preceding paragraph.
Article 13
Article 13-1
Article 14
Article 15
Article 16
Article 17
Article 18
Article 19
Article 20
Article 21
Article 22
Article 23
Article 24
Article 25
Article 26
Article 27
Article 28
Article 29
Article 30
Article 31
Article 32
Article 33
Top