| Article 19 |
|
| Article 20 |
|
| Article 21 |
|
| Article 22 |
|
| Article 23 |
|
| Article 24 |
A securities firm shall, during the warrant OTC-listing period, input into the GreTai-designated reporting website hedging information on a daily basis regarding estimated hedge positions and actual hedge positions in the warrants. In the case of outsourced risk management, a securities firm shall also report hedging information on the risk management institution in accordance with regulations.
Where a securities firm's estimates of hedge positions differ from actual hedge positions by more than a 20 percent positive or negative value for three consecutive business days or for any three business days during the most recent six business days, the GreTai shall immediately request an explanation from the securities firm and may perform an on-site investigation. Should the GreTai find its explanation obviously not reasonable, it may give the securities firm a demerit point; a securities firm may be barred from applying to issue warrants for the subsequent one-month period following an accumulation of three demerit points. For any positive or negative discrepancy between estimated and actual open positions greater than 50 percent, the GreTai may require mandatory implementation of risk-offsetting strategies by the securities firm.
Where the securities firm is a foreign institution, and its reporting on hedge positions under paragraph 1 shows actual hedge positions to be less than the estimated hedge positions, the securities firm shall place a monetary amount in its special hedge account equal to the market value of the underlying securities represented by the discrepancy between the open positions and the estimate.
The provisions of all paragraphs of this article shall apply mutatis mutandis to a securities firm engaging in hedging operations involving OTC contract-based call (put) warrants, or overseas call (put) warrants for which the underlying securities are domestic securities.. |
| Article 25 |
|